About Me

Name: AuVox
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Is this your car?

"'cause it coulda been drivin' by my ex-wife!", or "'we'll have your car returned shortly, Speaker Pelosi!', but I wanna tell ya...
 
Funny Pictures
Tags: PMS plate  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Extreme Sheep Art

I can't embed the video because... OK, 'cause I don't know how.  But this is one of the more entertaining videos I've seen in quite some time.
Tags: sheep art  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The world's least expensive car!

The Tata Nano is launched.   At $1979.00, even cheaper than a Macbook Pro! And still probably more reliable than a Land Rover.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'll just have a little icewater, thanks...

fail owned pwned pictures

(h/t: Failblog.org)

Tags: pee cola  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dreyfus wants Cheney behind bars

So Richard Dreyfus wants Dick Cheney in jail.
 
That's almost as stupid as the line in the story: "Dreyfuss knows a thing or two about Cheney, having played him in Oliver Stone's film, "W."" 
 
Let me respond for those who don't speak 'Hollywood':  "No.  Richard Dreyfus memorized some lines and played pretend for a conspiracy-theorist."    
 
To be fair, I realize that Dreyfus' delusional fantasies are typical of those who also believe that 'The X-Files' was a documentary.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Move the terrorists here? Now...now wait a minute..."

 
"Security risks? From the Gitmo prisoners? That's crazy talk! Obviously all the prisoners are innocent bystanders ensnared by America's bumbling net sweep of brown people."
 
The biggest problem with silly people who chant infantile slogans in the streets like "US out of Iraq!", or "Close Gitmo!" is that they can never answer the question, "Then what?"
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Die Mosquitoes! Die!

OK, it smacks a little of what might be created by Cyberdine--and eventually evolve into The Terminator--but I think this is just awesome.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why are colleges and Hollywood stars so Liberal?

Great (and short) interview at Right Wing News with Evan Sayet.  I'm not familiar with this guy...but I think I ought to be.
 
Here's a partial explanation of why colleges, professors, and show biz celebrities are so liberal:
 

...One of the lines I like to use is that stupidity is a luxury. And when you're young and you're on the college campuses and you don't have a job, you're not paying taxes. You're not starting a business. You don't have to worry about environmental policies that are ridiculous.

You're living on these college campuses where no matter how much you binge drink, no matter how much you projectile vomit, no matter how much you go wild for the cameras in Cancun and strip naked, the next day you wake up on a campus with lush manicured lawns.  ...somebody else has bought your food, cooked your food, serves you your food, and when you're finished, cleans your dishes for you.

...Then you have...the celebrities who have been retarded at the age of the child by their fabulous wealth. ...They don't have to make decisions which ...have consequences. ...Bruce Springsteen doesn't have to choose between putting money away for his retirement or spending it now. He can spend it now and have hundreds of millions for retirement too.

...This goes to professors as well that are on the left at college campuses. They can't get fired no matter how bad they are at their job. That isolates them from the need to be smart. It isolates from the need to be right. It isolates from the need to be good -- and these are things that allow somebody to hold onto their childish, foolish, and quite just plainly spoken, idiotic mentality that is modern liberalism...
 
As they say, read the whole thing.  It won't take long.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I can't stand with my Unions on this one

I'm a proud member of both AFTRA and the Screen Actors' Guild, the two performers unions whose hard work and tenacity have inspired solidarity among its members for years.  That is not to say they're without their problems.  SAG in particular has been controlled by hardline radicals for some years.  A recent election has begun to pull us back toward sanity.
 
Perhaps no industry in the country is more in need of unions.  Actors by nature are generally emotional, creative creatures, not given to left-brain analytical business decisions.  That's one reason why so many of us have agents and business managers.  We also operate individually as we go about our daily professional lives, to audition, record, or perform.  Thus, we're all subject to being "culled from the herd" at any given time--and eaten.
 
"Management" as defined in show biz is basically the massive studio and media conglomerates that produce the TV shows, movies, and many other projects that we depend on for our livelihood.  They're huge.
 
So:  "Massively huge, powerful, wealthy international media conglomerate" vs. "ingenue/model/waitress".  Who's got the advantage?
 
The studios make so much more from the actors' than vice versa, that the symbiosis is less like "Sharks and Remoras", and more like "Sharks and whatever tiny little water dwellers that hang around for Remoras' scraps".   The only possible way for performers to hold the line against being taken advantage of is through strong union representation.  (And, because unity equals strength, merging SAG and AFTRA will be critical--sooner rather than later--but that's an issue for another time.)
 
All that being said, the recent notices from both unions that I should "support and fight for Card Check", the Democrats' and unions' attempt to fundamentally change the American way, and eliminate the secret ballot from the unionizing process, goes against every fiber of my being as an American.
 
First of all, the performers' unions never have any trouble getting people to join; getting your SAG card is one of the rights-of-passage in Hollywood.  Secondly, the process eliminates the security an individual feels to vote his conscience--being approached by a couple of "union representatives" is also an example of "culling the herd".
 
I've always been against "Government Support for the Arts" under the assumption that if you need the government to support your art...maybe your art just isn't very good.  I feel the same way about card check:  if you can't convince someone to vote to join your union while in the privacy of the voting booth, you need to do a better job of persuading peoples' hearts and minds.
 
Card Check is un-American.  And wrong.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pretty much sums up how I feel about The Oscars

Parade Of Interchangeable Starlets Delights U.S. Populace

HOLLYWOOD, CA—A steady stream of indistinguishable, uniformly beautiful actresses brought excitement and joy to millions of Americans Sunday by donning similarly glamorous dresses that hugged their identical figures and marching past television cameras at consistent intervals. Nielsen ratings revealed more than half the country was transfixed by the procession of loose curls, white teeth, and vapid over-the-shoulder glances by each of the 100 percent transposable starlets. "It's amazing to be here," said any one of the striking females to an army of perky, unmemorable entertainment reporters. "Thank you! I can barely breathe in it. You look beautiful, too. I love your earrings." At the conclusion of the hour-long parade, the homogeneous beauties were handed gold statuettes to honor their near-exact roles in impossible-to-tell-apart motion pictures.

 
(h/t: The Onion)
Tags: oscars  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

And then there's this...

 
The Amazing Chinese Flying Militia!  (h/t: LGF
 
Something else for the Presdient to deal with.  Maybe he'll let Joe Biden handle it witha a comment ("pleaseohpleaseohplease...")
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The debate over global warming is OVER...!"

Turns out, not so much.
 
That fear-mongering Al Gore gravy-train is steadily heading off the rails.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

People are coming to their senses

Solid support for building nuclear powerplants, and favoring Republicans over Democrats , especially in the investment sector.
 
Caveat:  It's early.  Anti-Caveat: If Obama's current trends continue, 2010 could be the Democrats' Year Of The Meltdown.  And BTW:  Claiming that enforcing American laws is un-American ain't gonna help, Nance.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A President with honor

No surprise to those of us who admire the man, but President George W. Bush is taking the High Road when it comes to commenting on President Obama's performance.

As he says, "there are plenty of critics out there" that will provide commentary.
 
Expect President Bush to continue to keep his head held high, far out of the fray.  Further, expect any recognition of his honorable position to be non-existant--with the occassional exception--from the Left and MSM.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Scapegoat of the Week: AIG

I'm finding it harder and harder tp join the torches-and-pitchforks brigade on the way to the AIG castle.
 
As Glenn Beck illustrated on his show yesterday, and as Michelle Malkin's column shows us today, the AIG bonus fiasco is largely smoke-and-mirrors.  $165 million in bonuses is a lot of money--it's also a number America can get it's mind around.  The tens of billions the Obama Administration is tossing around is just too massive for people to comprehend, and Washington is focusing on the AIG situation so that people will be too distracted to try.
 
 
The AIG money is due its recipients by law.  Frankly, from a public relations standpoint, the recipients are foolish and selfish to take it, but that doesn't make it illegal.  Mitt Romney had an excellent take on it, and he's The Expert on turning around failing companies.
 
So how much are these huge bounses at AIG compared to the other stuff Obama's spending our money on?  From a comparitive standpoint, it's the same as if you were making $700,000 a year, and were to pay someone $165 bucks.
 
And center stage in this DC misdirection is (what a surprise!) Congressman Barney Frank, who is "Shocked!  Shocked!  That incompetence is being rewarded in this establishment!"  So I guess you'll be turning in your paychecks from now on, eh Barn?
 
Pot?  Kettle.
Tags: AIG bonuses  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »