About Me

Name: AuVox
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

2008 in a few moments

JibJab's Year In Review
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Palin naming-tradition continues

Bristol. Piper. Track. Willow. Trig.  

 
Giving unusual names to your kids isn't unique to Alaskans; and obviously Todd and Saracuda have moved well beyond Jason and Jessica. 
 
And it's not that, as Dave Barry says, they're just naming their "114 kids" with random nouns like "Dipper", "Lathe" and "Hamper".  As you can see here, they're all meaningful to the Palins.
 
 
And obviously the tradition continues with little Tripp.
Tags: Palin names  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Warm Congrats to the Palins

 
Both baby Tripp and Mom Bristol are apparently doing fine.  No word on Dad Levi.  They sure grow 'em studly in Ak, though.
 
Naturally, the Lefty press can't resist slamming The One They're Petrified Of even in announcing the birth of her grandchild.  In the first paragraph, no less. 
 
Nevermind that, as pointed out by Newsbusters, Sarah Palin's magnificent, inspiring speech at the RNC happened after Bristol's pregnancy announcement.  And that as many people watched that speech as watched Obama's acceptance speech.  No matter. 
 
According to the report, Sarah Palin's "quest for the vice presidency began to go downhill the day she announced the pregnancy".  But remember the motto of the MSM:  "Truth is just an inconvenience". 
 
You stay classy there, AP.
 
 
Tags: Palin birth  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Irrelevant boat meets Serious boat

Couldn't have happened to a more well-deserving, wacko, "America-hating moonbat".
 
Lesson:  Don't sail headlong into a war-zone without expecting a few minor inconveniences.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

oh, NOW it's a bad idea...

After years and years of demanding that President Bush close Gitmo, now the MSM is really concerned about what may happen if President Obama closes Gitmo.
 
Honest to God, newspapers are worth less than the newsprint they're printed on.
 
(H/T: H/A)
Tags: Gitmo   obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Did the Patriots get hosed?

Depends on if you're a whiny Massachusetts Liberal, or if you're willing to man-up.  Look, the Pats finished the season 11-5, and as usual they're playing their best ball late in the season.  They are clearly a better football team than at least half of the teams going to the playoffs.
 
So am I gonna whine and stamp my feet over how unfair it is that a team like the Chargers have a shot at the Championship with a record of 8-8 when we don't?  No.
 
Hey, the Patriots had their opportunity.  Yes, they were plagued by a few injuries that would have decimated a lesser team.  But they played sixteen games just like everybody else and they didn't win the one(s) they had to do advance.  According to the requirements that everybody abides by, they're out this year. 
 
So, am I disappointed?  Sure.  Bitter?  Not at all.  Should there be an asterisk next to the Super Bowl Champion because they didn't have to go through Foxborough in January this year?  Well, some people seem to think so.
 
Win or lose, Conservatives aren't afraid to play by the rules.
 
What's that?  Tom Brady--one of the greatest quaterbacks of all time--returns next year?  Oh, yeah.  Along with a few other healthy studs.  And I'm sure the Pats will be playing like they have something to prove.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Brief, Breezy, Brilliant

"They say we live and learn. Often what we learn is what damn fools we have been. " - Thomas Sowell
 
Mr. Sowell is one of the great thinkers of our time.  The fact that he's black makes him one of the people the Leftist Elite hate the most. (There are few who face more scorn from liberals than Black Conservatives).
 
His TownHall column today, Random Thoughts, is quick, wry, pity, and--typical of Sowell--deeply insightful.
 
Another gem:
Wal-Mart has done more for poor people than any ten liberals, at least nine of whom are almost guaranteed to hate Wal-Mart.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's your patriotic duty

"Shop damn it, SHOP" by JudyGr.
 
 
Are you saying that, apparently "retail sales are a little south of where they should be" this year, General Crankypants?.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The NYT covers for a terrorist

Governor Sarah Palin's famous statement that President-elect Obama's associations included "Palling around with terrroists" raised a lot of nasty heat among MSMers in full swoon-mode over their then-candidate Barack.
 
Ayers has gone on to "pooh-pooh" his past behavior as something just beyond teen-age pranks; including an an op-ed in the New York Times..  ( Hey! Remember when that was a newspaper?  Wow.  Good times...) While Ayers would like us to think that he wasn't much worse than the rowdy lad smashing a few pumpkins on Halloween, FBI agent Larry Grathwohl--who had infiltrated Ayers' Weather Underground--knew differently.
 
Unfortunately--but perhaps unsurprisingly--the New York Times declined to print the agent's op-ed response.
 
 
PajamasMedia's Bob Owens begins:
On December 5, the New York Times afforded former domestic terrorist Bill Ayers a chance to publish an op-ed, in which he defends himself from various charges made during the 2008 presidential campaign. That Ayers was given such an opportunity by the Times seems extraordinary; Barack Obama’s other mentors, former pastor Jeremiah Wright and Father Michael Pfleger, were subjected to as much public scrutiny as Ayers for their extremist politics and multi-decade associations with the president-elect, and yet it seems only Ayers was presented editorial space in the Times to defend himself. Perhaps even more extraordinary, however, is that the Times allowed Ayers to publish obvious lies about his terrorist past and rejected a rebuttal by the former FBI informant who lived through the history Ayers tried to rewrite.
As they say, Read The Whole Thing.
 
So, when it comes down to credibility?  I believe Sarah Palin.  And, obviously, Agent Grathwohl.




 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In dire straights? Need help?

 
I'm not a doctor.  I don't even play one on TV.  So the California Supreme Court says if I save your life and you get injured in the process, it's my fault.
 
Let me say that again:  You're in mortal danger.  I save your life.  Any injuries you sustain are my fault.
 
Fortunately for you, my Conservative and religious values mean more to me than California law.  So I'll help.  Well...I might help.  But I'll think about it for a few seconds.  Which might be the difference between life and death for you.  Oh, well.
 
Remind me again how lawyers and Left-leaning courts are good for America?  Anyone?  Buehler?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Franken ahead of Coleman

Somehow, somewhere, ballots keep mysteriously showing up for Al Franken.  "What are you implying?  Are you implying that Democrats are somehow (<<cough>> Blagojevich) dishonest??"
 
I know, I know... "I'm shocked!  Shocked! to find that cheating has been going on in the Democratic party!"
Those of us who've been paying attention for awhile knew it was probably inevitable.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

435 boneheads

Who was it that said (paraphrasing) "when the people find out they can just vote themselves money, it will be the end of the Republic"?
Congress votes themselves a raise.
  Now, there's an example of government for the people, huh?
 
An economy that the Democrtats say is "worse than the Great Depression"... so they decide they don't have to participate in the pain.
 
Any wonder their approval rating is nudging single-digits?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming hits Las Vegas

Thank you, Al Gore!  As a former resident of The Meadows, I remember vividly when a local TV weatherman said one summer night, "considerably cooler tomorrow.  Temperatures only about 105..."

Dennis Prager is fond of saying "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."  How soon, given all of the record low temperatures in the past few years, will it take the knucklehead, Chicken-Little Climate Alarmists to say, "Whoopsie!"?
 
Ain't holdin' the ol' breath.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hey, it's your money"

Bernard Chapin has a terrific piece; he recommends that Conservatives rally around a simple message: "Give the people their money back".  He's dead-on: Conservatives need to condense their messages into what people can remember and understand.  And--most importantly--what will resonate.
 
But I'd recommend changing "Give the people their money back" to "Hey, it's YOUR money."
 
His line tells the individual that government should act for the good of everyone (else).  My line talks directly to the voter.  And what the hey... it's also more youth oriented, with a little Dennis Leary influence there
 
While the idea of giving us ALL more of our money back is good, just, and charitable, people with those values are already Conservative.
 
We need to speak to the 20% of undecideds that sway elections, and they vote largely in their own best interests.
 
Hugh Hewitt had a good idea a cycle or so back, where he broke his suggested Republican talking-points down to a few words:
 
1) Win the war.
2) Cut the taxes.
3) Control the spending.
4) Confirm the judges.
5)  Secure the border.
 
Nobody running for office listened to him, of course; and we got our butts whipped.
 
The messages we promote need the short, concise, memorable effect of the above five slogans.  We're talking to people who get bored by commercials that last :15 seconds.  So far, Lefties have been far more effective with their slogans--"tax cuts for the rich" is an example.  Total horse-puckie, of course, but the Democrats don't care because it works.
 
Our principles, of course, have the added advantage of being good for America.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »